We shall remember that, at any time, choices of
IP protection shall always rest on profitability. If the patent protection make
people lose money, then people would choose to avoid that.
By patenting the receipe of coke, Coca Cola
company have to DISCLOSE the receipe to the world. In return, the receipe MAY
be protected for a max of 20 years. After the protecting period expires, Coca
Cola receipe falls into public knowledge, and anyone may use it anywhere.
It is not so easy to crack the coke receipe. Why
would Coca Cola disclose their receipe to exchange for a short protection?
Surely, if the receipe is disclosed
accidentally, anyone in the world may begin to use this receipe, and numberous
competitors appear. In order to minimize the harm brought by the possible
competitors, Coca Cola has invested a lot of money on their Trademarks and Scale
of Production.
Now Coca Cola have a famous brand. Even two coke
products taste the same, you would still choose Coca Cola.
By holding huge scale of production, Coca Cola
is able to produce coke at a very very low cost. Even when another company
begin to produce the same coke, they can never make coke this cheap.
Even when it is profitable to patent your
product, you may still see no “patent” directly linked to a particular “product
model”. See iPhone. Thousand of patents may be linked to the product, and there
is no patent to protect “iPhone X”. We may need such strategies to mislead
competitors, max the protection range, …
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét